🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension caused by the presentation of a new 28-point plan for resolving the conflict appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A American diplomat spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its retaliation: another massive barrage of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, diplomatic battles are waged: optimistic declarations are delivered from various governments. Immense energy is allocated on containing particular approaches. By night, the Kremlin forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the key method for achieving "settlement".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from across the border, a capability enabled by timely intelligence. From vantage locations, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to engage hostile aerial threats streaked across the sky – sophisticated military planes delivered to Ukraine by NATO members.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: several firings fired to intercept a incoming threat. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely provided by Western nations. Every launch creates sudden vibrations, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly becomes sober acceptance: possibly the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from ruin and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a automatic firearm engaged a drone somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – probably allied-provided weaponry. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its objective.

Intermittently, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: seven people killed, destruction and heating outages in numerous residences as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As typically, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a need that European nations are demonstrably unable to fill in the immediate future.

Failed Diplomacy

The 28-point plan from American leadership provoked deep reactions, controversy and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new initiative from US leadership unfolds according to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually secure success. This cycle will, no doubt, continue.

Tactical Assessments

It is easy to blame certain parties of consistently pushing Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration operates on a principle well known to experienced diplomats: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have been unable to protect through force. The US administration presumes that it is unrealistic to pressure the Kremlin to abandon the territory that it already controls in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does minimal to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from assuming that the status quo will not change more in its advantage in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is certain that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their motivation to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is virtually nonexistent. There may be numerous efforts to stop fighting, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but avoiding a entire defensive failure until circumstances change in its favour.

Current Realities

Factually, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: leadership ambitions to mediate resolution and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any plan Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not move to homefront challenges. And although their mission will now be significantly challenging after current events, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to kill the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by US administration, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, latest revelations, all served their function.

While new proposals based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist political attacks from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and reflect specific hesitation to change the course of events, if they stand together and enhance their military capacity at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to repel nightly air assaults will, for the foreseeable future, primarily depend on sustained allied backing.